formail header concatenation
Ruud H.G. van Tol
rvtol at isolution.nl
Wed Jan 21 23:27:37 CET 2009
Per Jessen wrote:
> I'm sure this must have been spotted before, so maybe it's not a problem
> at all, but -
> I see a difference in behaviour between 3.15 and 3.22 - in 3.15, headers
> with tabs in the continuation line were correctly concatenated,
> _including_ the tab. In 3.22, the tab is missing.
> Is this expected behaviour?
AFAIK, the first whitespace character after the newline should be
discarded, because it is the functional whitespace. In this way you can
have a break inside long strings without any embedded whitespace.
More information about the procmail