formail header concatenation
dman at nomotek.com
Wed Jan 21 16:23:55 CET 2009
Per Jessen wrote Wednesday, January 21, 2009 15:59:
> LuKreme wrote:
> > On 20-Jan-2009, at 01:54, Per Jessen wrote:
> >> I'm sure this must have been spotted before, so maybe it's not a
> >> problem
> >> at all, but -
> >> I see a difference in behaviour between 3.15 and 3.22 - in 3.15,
> >> headers with tabs in the continuation line were correctly
> >> concatenated, _including_ the tab.
> > INCORRECTLY.
> >> In 3.22, the tab is missing.
> >> Is this expected behaviour?
> > Yes.
> Okay. It seems a little odd that words that were previously separated
> by the newline are no longer separated once the lines have been
> concatenated, but that's just my opinion.
I would like LuKreme to back up his assertion. I have been meaning
to respond to your question, but have no time right now. For the
moment I will add that I was unaware of the difference but have
been aware of a perhaps related bug, and I will detail it when I can
a bit later. I do not agree with LuKreme's view on it at this time,
but could be persuaded with some evidence.
More information about the procmail