formail header concatenation
kremels at kreme.com
Tue Jan 20 23:06:00 CET 2009
On 20-Jan-2009, at 01:54, Per Jessen wrote:
> I'm sure this must have been spotted before, so maybe it's not a
> at all, but -
> I see a difference in behaviour between 3.15 and 3.22 - in 3.15,
> with tabs in the continuation line were correctly concatenated,
> _including_ the tab.
> In 3.22, the tab is missing.
> Is this expected behaviour?
Advance and attack! Attack and destroy! Destroy and rejoice!
More information about the procmail